Top Mathematics discussions
NishMath
@daringfireball.net
//
Apple's recent study has revealed significant limitations in the reasoning capabilities of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), despite their advancements in simulating thought processes for complex problem-solving. The research, conducted by Apple researchers and published on June 7, 2025, challenges the widespread belief in these models' ability to excel at intricate tasks. The study pinpointed that these reasoning models actually perform worse as tasks become more difficult, and in some cases, they "think" less. This discovery highlights structural flaws in how these reasoning mechanisms scale, ultimately impacting their effectiveness in solving problems as their complexity increases. The study involved testing models such as Claude 3.7 and Deepseek-R1.
The Apple research team identified three distinct performance regimes by putting the reasoning models through their paces in four classic puzzle environments: Tower of Hanoi, Checkers Jumping, River Crossing, and Blocks World. In the first regime, for simple tasks, standard LLMs without reasoning capabilities demonstrated better accuracy and lower token consumption compared to LRMs. The second regime emerged at intermediate complexity, where reasoning models began to show an advantage over standard LLMs. However, the third regime revealed a complete performance collapse for all models when faced with high-complexity tasks, with accuracy plummeting to zero even with ample compute resources.
The study raises crucial questions about the true reasoning capabilities of AI models and suggests that their behavior is better explained by sophisticated pattern matching rather than formal reasoning. Researchers found that the Large Reasoning Models have limitations in exact computation: they fail to use explicit algorithms and reason inconsistently across puzzles. According to the Apple study, these models "exhibit a counter-intuitive scaling limit: their reasoning effort increases with problem complexity up to a point, then declines despite having an adequate token budget." The findings challenge the artificial intelligence industry's confidence in reasoning models' capabilities.
ImgSrc: mlr.cdn-apple.c
References :
The Apple research team identified three distinct performance regimes by putting the reasoning models through their paces in four classic puzzle environments: Tower of Hanoi, Checkers Jumping, River Crossing, and Blocks World. In the first regime, for simple tasks, standard LLMs without reasoning capabilities demonstrated better accuracy and lower token consumption compared to LRMs. The second regime emerged at intermediate complexity, where reasoning models began to show an advantage over standard LLMs. However, the third regime revealed a complete performance collapse for all models when faced with high-complexity tasks, with accuracy plummeting to zero even with ample compute resources.
The study raises crucial questions about the true reasoning capabilities of AI models and suggests that their behavior is better explained by sophisticated pattern matching rather than formal reasoning. Researchers found that the Large Reasoning Models have limitations in exact computation: they fail to use explicit algorithms and reason inconsistently across puzzles. According to the Apple study, these models "exhibit a counter-intuitive scaling limit: their reasoning effort increases with problem complexity up to a point, then declines despite having an adequate token budget." The findings challenge the artificial intelligence industry's confidence in reasoning models' capabilities.
ImgSrc: mlr.cdn-apple.c
Share:
References :
- machinelearning.apple.com: Apple machine learning discusses Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem Complexity
- PPC Land: PPC Land reports on Apple study exposes fundamental limits in AI reasoning models through puzzle tests.
- the-decoder.com: The Decoder covers Apple's study, highlighting the limitation in thinking abilities of reasoning models.
Classification:
- HashTags: #AppleAI #LRMResearch #AIScalingLimits
- Company: Apple
- Target: AI Researchers, Model Developers
- Product: Apple intelligence
- Feature: Reasoning Abilities
- Type: Research
- Severity: Informative